Rudolph's Sanderling Beach Cabanas Destroyed

The Cabanas at the Sanderling Beach Club on February 28, 2019. Photo by Francis Dzikowski.

This morning we received a message from Max Strang - a local architect in Sarasota, Florida - that Paul Rudolph’s 1952 Sanderling Beach Club cabanas were completely destroyed overnight by Hurricane Helene.

This story is developing and we will share more details as they are received.

Photo: Max Strang

Photo: Max Strang

Photo: Max Strang

The structures were designed by Paul Rudolph from 1952-1953. More information about the project, including drawings and photos taken before the storm can be found on our project page here.

Sarasota has faced significant storms in the past, including Hurricane Ian exactly two years ago today. In 1966, the pavilion roof of Rudolph’s Umbrella Residence was blown off the house by winds from nearby Hurricane Alma. It was eventually rebuilt in 2011.

We wish everyone to stay safe and have spoken to friends at Architecture Sarasota who will be sharing news as more is learned about damage from the storm.

Some of Rudolph’s notable structures in the area threatened by Hurricane Helene are the following:

You can click through the images above to learn more about each project.

Circle, Square, Triangle: Two Exhibitions of the Work of Late Architect Myron Goldfinger Opening on September 19th and 20th, 2024

Myron Goldfinger. Photo © David Michael Kennedy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

New York (August 29, 2024) – Two concurrent exhibitions celebrating the work of the late architect Myron Goldfinger will open on September 19 and 20, 2024. Circle, Square, Triangle: Houses I Never Lived In. The Residential Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008 at The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture (PRIMA) will be on view and Circle, Square, Triangle: A World I wanted to Live In. The Public and Unbuilt Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008 will be shown at the Mitchell Algus Gallery.

The two interconnected exhibitions offer complementary studies of Goldfinger’s work, exploring his built residential projects and his unbuilt and community architecture. Both exhibitions consist of original material uncovered during the Paul Rudolph Institute’s process of archiving and indexing Goldfinger’s estate, much of which has never been seen.

The Myron and June Goldfinger Residence, designed by Myron Goldfinger in 1969 for Waccabuc, New York. This original drawing and others will be on view at the Paul Rudolph Institute. © The Estate of Myron Goldfinger.

At PRIMA, there will be multimedia studies outlining the designs for several houses, including contemporary and historical models, a range of original drawings, from conception to construction – either graphite on vellum or ink on mylar - and original photographic prints by Norman McGrath. Projects include the Goldfinger Residence in Waccabuc, New York designed in 1969; the Zack Residence in Sands Point, New York designed in 1977; and the 1975 design for Roberta Flack’s apartment at the Dakota building in New York City. The Mitchell Algus Gallery will explore unbuilt projects that Goldfinger designed including several for New York City, providing a local context for the exhibition. This includes a housing proposal for Roosevelt Island designed in 1975 and a proposal for the Dag Hammarskjold Plaza from 1970. Again, a collection of renderings and models outline the design process.

Roosevelt Island Housing Proposal, an unbuilt project designed by Myron Goldfinger in 1975 for New York City. © The Estate of Myron Goldfinger.

The curation of Circle, Square, Triangle sets out to demonstrate Goldfinger’s characteristic and distinctive approach to architecture, which is embedded in the title itself. The phrase “Circle, Square, Triangle” originates from Goldfinger’s own words—he considered these three basic shapes to be the heart of his design, shapes he would transform and assemble into dramatic volumes. His playfulness with geometry led to spectacular interior and exterior architectural features in his work, such as soaring ceilings and gravity-defying cantilevers. Goldfinger insisted that “the fashion of the moment is so temporary. Only the timeless basic geometry repeats in time”. His work was both deeply intuitive while also conveying a clarity of vision. With its clean lines and careful volumetric assemblage, it was honest and direct, described best by Goldfinger himself as ‘ordered simplicity’.

Born in 1933, Goldfinger grew up in Atlantic City. He studied architecture at the University of Pennsylvania, under Louis Kahn and Paul Rudolph, who informed his approach to geometry, spatial hierarchy and material expression. Goldfinger worked for Karl Linn, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, and Philip Johnson before establishing his own practice in 1966. That same year, he married interior designer June Matkovic, who designed the interiors for his buildings. Goldfinger also began teaching at the Pratt Institute from 1966 to 1976. He designed residences around the world, focusing particularly on the North-East, including Connecticut, Long Island, and New Jersey. These buildings reflect Goldfinger’s sustained interest in stark geometric forms juxtaposed with the exuberance of 1970s and 1980s interiors with oversized plants, expansive mirrored walls, textured carpeting and abstract art. In his monograph, Myron Goldfinger: Architect (1992), he wrote “I am always building the houses I never lived in as a boy.” Goldfinger was also interested in community architecture, as demonstrated in his first book, Villages in the Sun: Mediterranean Community Architecture (1969, reprinted 1993). Here, he voiced his belief that community architecture “is a place for human experience, a rich variety of forms and spaces in which to live, a structural framework which permits the expression of the individual, and the participation of all.”

“The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture’s collaboration with the Myron Goldfinger Estate began as an effort to digitize the archive of this important Modernist architect,” said Kelvin Dickinson, President of PRIMA.  “This show is composed of a fraction of the incredible drawings produced during his lifetime. We hope the preservation of his built work is a direct result of a renewed appreciation brought about by showing it to the public.”

June Goldfinger, Myron’s wife, stated, “there is a joy in his work. The volumes Myron so intuitively created – with just a scribble of graphite on paper – complex, soaring, volumetric spaces with his command and love of the simplicity of juxtaposing geometric forms. He will always be remembered as a monumental Modernist. I worked with Myron on the interiors and was in awe of the beauty of the architecture. He designed a landscape for living, always letting the architecture dictate the interior solutions.”

Exhibition details for Circle, Square, Triangle: Houses I Never Lived In. The Residential Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008

Opening reception: Thursday September 19, 2024, 5-8 PM

Hours: Tuesday-Wednesday: 1-4 PM, Thursday: 1-7 PM, Friday-Saturday: 1-4 PM; and by appointment other days/times.

Location: The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture, The Modulightor Building, 246 East 58th Street, New York, NY 10022. The exhibition space is elevator accessible.

Exhibition details for the Mitchell Algus Gallery Show: Circle, Square, Triangle: A World I wanted to Live In. The Public and Unbuilt Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008

Opening reception: Friday September 20, 2024, 5-8 PM

Hours: Thursday-Saturday, 2-5 PM and by appointment

Location: The Mitchell Algus Gallery, 132 Delancey Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10002.

The exhibition space is not ADA accessible.

About the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture

The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture is a New York City-based non-profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to educating the public about modern architecture and the need to preserve it.  Through preservation and advocacy efforts, educational programs, public events and maintaining and developing an archive of written and graphic materials, the Institute promotes the legacy of modernist architects in a larger architectural and cultural context to interested students, journalists, scholars, and the general public.

For more information about the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture, visit www.paulrudolph.institute and find them on Threads, TikTok, Twitter (X), Facebook and Instagram @PaulRudolphInst

About the Mitchell Algus Gallery

The Mitchell Algus Gallery was founded in 1992 on Thompson Street in SoHo by Mitchell Algus, a former public-school teacher who grew up in Brooklyn and Long Island. After gaining a reputation for exhibiting artwork by then little-known artists such as Lee Lozano, Barkley Hendricks and Judith Bernstein, he relocated to a new space off Delancey Street in the Lower East Side in 2010. Algus, who wants each show to feel like a discovery, is committed to showing work he considers neglected. During the pandemic Algus discovered the work of architect Myron Goldfinger following an interest in local overlooked post-war architecture.

# # #

Press Contact

Kate Robertson, Susan Grant Lewin Associates: kate@susangrantlewin.com

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture Announces Partnership with the Myron Goldfinger Estate to Digitize His Architectural Archive

The late architect Myron Goldfinger, in an undated photograph digitized by the Paul Rudolph Institute in collaboration with the Myron Goldfinger Estate.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture
07/22/2024

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture Announces Partnership with the Myron Goldfinger Estate to Digitize His Architectural Archive

Complete Collection of Drawings, Models and Photographs to be Digitized and Made Accessible to the Public

NEW YORK, NY (July 22, 2024) – The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (“PRIMA”) today announced a partnership with the Estate of Myron Goldfinger to digitize, index and publish the architect’s archive, most of which is unavailable online.

“The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture represents the Rudolph Estate. Part of our mission is to preserve, protect and share his legacy to ensure it continues,” said Kelvin Dickinson, President of PRIMA.  “Our collaboration with the Goldfinger Estate is a great example of a partnership to promote an equally important architect’s legacy. By working together, we will digitize the archive and make it available to the public.”

Materials to be digitized include original and copies of drawings, blueprints, renderings and other material of or related to architectural projects that Myron Goldfinger created during his lifetime; Photographs of sites, construction and finished architectural projects; books by Myron Goldfinger such as his 1969 Villages in the Sun: Mediterranean Community Architecture including material both published and unpublished; and physical items including presentation and study models. The scope and depth of these records reflect the richness and diversity of Goldfinger’s fifty year career and features over 100 built and unbuilt projects.

Myron’s widow June Goldfinger stated, “archives are for future architects to study and learn from. Like Rudolph, Myron’s work was committed to honest geometry based upon his study of the past. Our collaboration to catalog his work will allow people to understand and be immersed in his architecture.”

The Paul Rudolph Institute intends to mount an exhibit of Goldfinger’s work later this year, featuring material shown before with newer items discovered during the processing of the archives.

About the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture

The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture is a New York City-based non-profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to educating the public about modern architecture and the need to preserve it.  Through preservation and advocacy efforts, educational programs, public events and maintaining and developing an archive of written and graphic materials, the Institute promotes the legacy of modernist architects in a larger architectural and cultural context to interested students, journalists, scholars, and the general public. 

For more information about the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture, visit www.paulrudolph.institute and find them on Threads (@PaulRudolphInst), Twitter (@PaulRudolphInst), Facebook (@PaulRudolphInst) and Instagram (@PaulRudolphInst).

Media Contact:
Kelvin Dickinson
kelvin.dickinson@paulrudolph.institute
(212) 404-5922
www.paulrudolph.institute

June Goldfinger Joins the Board of the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture

June Goldfinger with her husband, the late architect Myron Goldfinger, at Cove Castles, a resort they designed in Anguilla.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture
07/10/2024

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture Announces June Goldfinger as New Board Member

June Goldfinger brings a passion to create and support the preservation of beautiful things to the Institute.

NEW YORK, NY (July 10, 2024) –The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (“PRIMA”) announced the appointment of June Goldfinger to the Board of Directors. This brings the number of board members to eight.

After studying at Parsons School of Design, June Goldfinger opened an architectural and interior design company in 1965 with her husband, the late architect Myron Goldfinger. He designed the exteriors, and she did the interiors and everything in them - from furniture and flatware to lighting and rugs. She later grew to become an international designer and manufacturer working in 17 different countries.

In 1992, Goldfinger opened the Katonah General Store (known as KGS) to showcase her designs including custom-made clothing, 18-karat gold jewelry, shoes and even eyeglasses of her own design. Ralph Lauren, Martha Stewart, and opera singer Jessye Norman were among her clients before she closed the atelier.

Following Myron’s death in 2023, June curated ‘Circle Square Triangle: The Architecture of Myron Goldfinger’ which is the first major exhibition of their collaborative work and includes original drawings and house models. She also wanted to find a place where she could continue to support and celebrate the importance of modernism.

June Goldfinger stated, “Myron had an understanding of architecture just as Paul Rudolph did. The two of them were very much alike, but their designs were unique based upon a vision that never wavered. Working with Myron was an incredible joy. He was so true to his principles and his love of geometry. Rudolph had a similar vision about the importance of architecture, and I’m truly committed to celebrating it through the Paul Rudolph Institute.”

“June is incredibly talented and a true believer in the power and beauty of modern design,” said Kelvin Dickinson, President of PRIMA.  “She and Myron shared Rudolph’s belief that it should be promoted and preserved. We are honored to have her join us and look forward to collaborating with her.”                      

About the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture

The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture is a New York City-based non-profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to educating the public about modern architecture and the need to preserve it.  Through preservation and advocacy efforts, educational programs, public events and maintaining and developing an archive of written and graphic materials, the Institute promotes the legacy of modernist architects in a larger architectural and cultural context to interested students, journalists, scholars, and the general public. 

For more information about the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture, visit www.paulrudolph.institute and find them on Threads (@PaulRudolphInst), Twitter (@PaulRudolphInst), Facebook (@PaulRudolphInst) and Instagram (@PaulRudolphInst).

Media Contact:
Kelvin Dickinson
kelvin.dickinson@paulrudolph.institute
(212) 404-5922
www.paulrudolph.institute

Download the press release here.

Paul Rudolph's Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building landmark vote is TONIGHT at 6pm

Rudolph’s 1957 Blue Cross Blue Shield Building. Photo by Kelvin Dickinson

A vote to designate Paul Rudolph’s 1957 Blue Cross Blue Shield Building in Boston, Massachusetts as a local landmark will be held during tonight’s hearing of the Landmarks Commission. The hearing follows the release by the commission of a study report about the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Building on November 20, 2023. The report was later amended and a copy can be found here.

The Commission will hold two votes: first, to accept amendments to the Study Report, followed by a final vote on the landmark designation.

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture and the Paul Rudolph Estate thank everyone who let the City of Boston know that Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building should be a landmark.

Here’s how to attend tonight’s hearing:

WHEN - TUESDAY, February 27 at 6:00 PM.
The Meeting will begin at 4:00pm, with the Blue Cross portion starting at 6pm.

WHERE - This hearing will be held virtually and not in person. To participate, please use one of the following:

Thank you for your support of preserving Paul Rudolph's legacy!

The Paul Rudolph Institute earns Platinum Seal of Transparency

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture is a Private Operating Foundation dedicated to financial transparency and since 2019 was awarded a Seal of Transparency from GuideStar, the world’s largest repository of trusted historical and present-day information on nonprofits, foundations, and the capital that funds them.

We're proud to say we've earned GuideStar's Highest Seal of Transparency for 2024.

The Platinum Seal of Transparency is the highest level of recognition offered by GuideStar. By sharing metrics that highlight the progress we are making toward our mission, we're helping you, our donors, directly see the impact your donations are making to move our organization forward. 

By updating our GuideStar Nonprofit Profile to earn a Platinum Seal, we can now easily share up-to-date organizational metrics with you, as well as GuideStar's immense online audience, which includes donors, grantmakers, our peers, and the media.

To reach the Platinum level, we've added information to our GuideStar Nonprofit Profile: basic contact and organizational information; financial information; qualitative information about goals and strategies; and quantitative information about results and progress toward our mission. By providing this information, we have demonstrated our commitment to transparency and giving donors and funders meaningful data to evaluate our performance. 

The metrics we are reporting are a direct result of the generous funds donated to us. Without your support, our mission of promoting and preserving Paul Rudolph’s legacy would not be possible. We truly appreciate your continued support. To make a donation, please go here.

Visit our Nonprofit Profile on GuideStar to see why we earned this seal. To learn more, go to our organization profile here.

Modulightor is Made a Landmark and Gifted to the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture

Paul Rudolph & Ernst Wagner in 1975. Photo from the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture archives.

As the year draws to a close, we have two pieces of good news to share - and they both involve our headquarters: the Modulightor Building.

First, we are happy to report that the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission voted unanimously to make the building a New York City landmark at this week’s hearing on December 19th. At the public hearing on November 28th, 2023 four people testified in support of designation and no one spoke in opposition. In addition, the commission received 30 written submissions in support of designation. The building now joins Rudolph’s 23 Beekman Place residence and the Hirsch (Halston) Residence at 101 East 63rd Street as New York City landmarks designed by the Mr. Rudolph.

The Commissioners had praise for Mr. Rudolph’s work. Vice Chair Frederick Bland said, “Rudolph was the reason I became and architect, so he’s an important guy for me. I think this is a great designation. Partly, because there are fewer and fewer Rudolph buildings around and he’s undeniably an important midcentury and later architect.”

Commissioner Jeanne Lufty noted Rudolph’s Modulightor was being reviewed by the Commission along with Ulrich Franzen’s 1957 Barkin, Levin & Company Office Pavilion. “Both of these projects are aberrations from their brutalist style and so they are a little more refined and they are definitely a little more expressive of what was going on at the particular time, and as Fred said we are so fortunate to sort of capture them and preserve them and recognize them and I am so happy to be part of that process,” she said.

“This is one of my favorite buildings,” said Commissioner Everardo Jefferson. “And the reason is, is the intricacy of it. And the exterior is so intricate and then you go inside and it becomes even more intricate. And you begin to wonder about the mind of this guy, how he was able to put these pieces together and move them around. Its just a marvelous experience.”

Commissioner Michael Goldblum said, “I was lucky enough to tour this building a few years ago and its really a marvel, not only because of its design - which is remarkable - but because of the integration of the architect’s own personality and history into every aspect of the building. Its his Taliesin in a way, he wanted it to kind of be this little idealized expression of his ideology and methodology built in a mid-block site of Manhattan of all places. And its really a remarkable site and the prospect that the interior could become designated as well is I think to be greatly anticipated. When you see work like this, its so mechanistic and designed - its rectilinear. His drawings are so crisp and sharp and then you go and you see how he did it. The technology was so loose and handmade and artisanal in a way. It kind of works against the design but it makes it more charming at the same time. It is really a fascinating building and greatly deserving of protection.”

“The architects have a lot to say about this one obviously,” said Commissioner Stephen Chu. “I’ve always loved his sensibility to human scale and if you look at this, essentially glass building, it has so much human scale to it. And you compare it to a lot of the developer buildings being done right now which are very flat. This doesn’t have a lot of depth though, yet that minimal depth is able to achieve shadow, light and human scale which is so wonderful.”

Commission Chair Sarah Carroll concluded with, “so I think we have a lot of support for this one… I think this would be a great addition to our very special New York City landmarks. And I want to thank the owners. We have been working with the Institute that runs the building and they have been very engaged and very supportive and we’ve had really wonderful exchanges and conversations about this during the calendaring. And we’re also talking about the interior which is not yet of age, but we’re talking to them and we’ll keep an eye on that until it does become eligible for consideration.”

Commissioner Chen moved to landmark the Modulightor building and was seconded by Commissioner Goldblum.

"New York City's streetscape has always served as a canvas for some of the world's most creative minds, and the buildings designated today highlight two exceptionally innovative designs by internationally prominent modern architects, one at the start of his career, and the other towards the end of it," said Landmarks Preservation Commission Chair Sarah Carroll in a follow-up press release by the Commission. "I'm pleased that the Commission has chosen to recognize these modern architectural gems, and grateful that they'll be preserved for future generations to come."

After the decision, Ernst Wagner gave the following comment:

"During his lifetime, Rudolph wished our residence at 23 Beekman Place would become a study and resource center for the architectural community. When that didn't happen, I promised him that I'd use the Modulightor building to fulfill his wish and then created the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture. It is fitting that the Modulightor building – designed by and dedicated to Paul Rudolph – will be preserved as a living example of his genius. Thank you to the Landmarks Preservation Commission for ensuring future generations will get to experience and learn from his work."

The landmarking of the Modulightor building resulted in the second piece of good news to end the year: the Modulightor building was gifted to the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture by Ernst Wagner.

As referenced in his above comment, Ernst founded the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture to keep his promise to Paul Rudolph that a study center would be created to share Rudolph’s ideas about architecture with the public.

We are profoundly grateful to Mr. Wagner for his continuous support of our mission to protect Mr. Rudolph’s legacy and promote his ideas about modern architecture. His gift allows the Institute to ensure the Modulightor building remains a publicly accessible, living example of Mr. Rudolph’s work and ideas.

We’ve got more planned for the coming year, and thank you to Ernst, the team at the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission and all of you for making this year especially notable!

Rudolph's Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building gets support at Boston's Landmark Commission

Paul Rudolph with a model of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Building in Boston.

A proposal to landmark Paul Rudolph’s 1957 Blue Cross Blue Shield Building in Boston, Massachusetts was discussed at a public hearing of the Landmarks Commission Tuesday night. The hearing follows the release by the commission of a study report about the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Building on November 20, 2023.

After reading the proposal’s recommendation for landmarking, the commission jumped right into public comments. Acknowledging there was no attendance by elected officials, members of the Boston Planning & Development Agency or the Massachusetts Historical Commission, the property owner was first to speak.

The owner was represented by Steve Belkin, founder of Trans National Group, and Paul Malnati, Senior Vice President of Real Estate. Mr. Malnati has been involved since the original 2006 RFP for ‘Trans National Place’ designed by Renzo Piano, which had proposed to demolish Rudolph’s Blue Cross-Blue Shield building. They were joined by attorney Matthew Kiefer from Goulston & Storrs and CBT (Childs Bertman Tseckares) as architectural consultant.

The owner said they looked at several options to make Rudolph’s building ‘economically viable’ including adding additional stories, building an addition in the adjacent public plaza, and converting the building from office space to residential apartments. They did not state an objection to the proposed designation.

Speaking in favor of landmarking the building was Tim Rohan, an architectural historian from UMass Amherst who has written extensively about Rudolph and the building; Kelvin Dickinson, President of the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture; and Carter Jackson, a PhD candidate in architectural history at Boston University who wrote a HABS report on Rudolph’s nearby Boston Government Services Center.

“I think the building is idiosyncratic as much of Rudolph’s architecture is,” said Rohan, who also noted a descendent of the building’s iconic design is the Pompidou Center by Richard Rogers, who studied under Rudolph. “I think the public and citizens of Boston will not be served by a larger building on this site so I’m happy that Trans National is considering preserving it.”

Kelvin Dickinson said, “We urge the Commission to consider this historic property's architectural value and its special position as one of only three structures designed by Paul Rudolph in Boston. We therefore ask that the Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building be designated a landmark so that it may be preserved for future generations to learn from and experience.”

Carter Jackson said, “I second the last two speakers. I believe the building is very worthy of the landmark designation. I would also add that Boston was supposed to have two tall buildings by Paul Rudolph. The second one was the tower meant for the center of the Boston Government Services Center. It was supposed to be 25 plus stories, it ended up not being built and I think it really hurt that complex. Its made it seem quite incomplete and desolate. So I think it would be a real shame to lose this one.”

The commission then noted:

We did have quite a few people submit in favor of the study report and in favor of moving forward with designation of this as a Boston landmark. We received feedback from as far away as San Juan, Puerto Rico, and New Orleans as well as from other professors of art and architectural history from Boston College and Wellesley University as well as the author of “Paul Rudolph: The Late Work”.

The commission said submitted commentary would be available to commissioners and that all were in favor of the study report and moving forward with designation. No one spoke in opposition of the report.

Commissioner John Amodeo said, “given we’ve lost access to two facades (by construction of the adjacent Trans National Place) we’d want to protect the remaining facades and the vulnerable façade would be the façade facing the plaza that could in fact contain a building if the plaza is not identified as a character-defining resource.” He recommended including the plaza as part of the protected site.

Next steps include accepting written statements up to 3 work days after the public hearing. Given the interest in the building’s status, the commission decided to extend the period for written testimony until December 27th.

When the submission period ends, the hearing will be closed and any amendments to the study report will be drafted by staff. The commission will then meet and review the final study report and vote on accepting it and designating the building. The amended report and the date of the next hearing will be posted online. We will continue to follow this effort and let everyone know what needs to be done in the future.

Finally, the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture and the Paul Rudolph Estate urge everyone who hasn’t already done so, to please let the City of Boston know that Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building should be a landmark!

Please WRITE AN EMAIL OR LETTER urging the Landmarks Commission to designate Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross Blue Shield Building as a local landmark to blc@boston.gov.

Thank you for your support of preserving Paul Rudolph's legacy!

Help Make Paul Rudolph's Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building a Boston Landmark

Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross Blue Shield Building in Boston after completion. Photo by Joseph Molitor.

Paul Rudolph’s 1957 Blue Cross Blue Shield Building in Boston, Massachusetts will be considered for local landmark designation during an upcoming public hearing of the Landmarks Commission. The hearing follows the release by the commission of a study report about the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Building on November 20, 2023.

The report describes the building’s historical and architectural significance with the following:

The building at 133 Federal Street, colloquially known as the Blue Cross Blue Shield Building, is significant for its associations with the urban renewal movement that took place in Boston’s core downtown area in the 1950s and 1960s. It was the first new building to be erected in the Central Business District since the 1920s, and was one of the earliest buildings erected in Boston in the Brutalist style. It is one of three buildings in Boston designed by Paul Rudolph, and it is especially notable as his first tall building and an early prototype of the idiosyncratic design philosophies that would then influence the remainder of his impactful career. Its distinctive form with Y-shaped, precast-concrete piers and columns, large white quartz aggregate, and an innovative engineering and HVAC system hidden within the nonstructural columns were all a direct challenge to the glass curtain wall, and pushed the boundaries of contemporary architectural discourse. The building contributes to Boston’s collection of Brutalist architecture which transformed the city in the 1960s and 1970s, and represents the resulting shift in the design idiom of Boston and the United States from the International style to postmodernism. 

The recent threats to Rudolph’s diminishing body of work, combined with the 2009 Boston Landmarks Commission’s survey update of cultural and architectural resources in Boston’s Central Business District which determined that the Blue Cross Blue Shield Building was eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, inspired the petition for designation. 

This study report contains Standards and Criteria which have been prepared to guide future physical changes to the property in order to protect its integrity and character.

The report concludes with the following recommendations:

  1. That the exterior of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Building at 133 Federal Street be designated

    by the Boston Landmarks Commission as a Landmark, under Chapter 772 of the Acts of 1975,

    as amended (see Section 3.4 of this report for Relationship to Criteria for Designation);

  2. That the boundaries corresponding to Assessor’s parcel #0304206000 be adopted without

    modification;

  3. And that the Standards and Criteria recommended by the staff of the Boston Landmarks

    Commission be accepted.

The study report will be discussed at a public hearing on Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 4 p.m. Members of the public are invited to attend this hearing and provide comments.

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture and the Paul Rudolph Estate urge everyone to please let the City of Boston know that Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building should be a landmark!

WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP

FIRST - READ the study report prepared by the Landmarks Commission. It documents the history of the building and its significance. It also details the options available to the Commission and the standards used to maintain the building once it is landmarked. You can download a copy of the report HERE.

SECOND - Please LEAVE FEEDBACK about the report on the Landmark Commission’s website. Comments can be anonymous and the city does take notice of the number of comments ‘for’ and ‘against’ the report. We left the following comment, for example: “This report is an excellent and thorough justification for the need to landmark Paul Rudolph's Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building. The architectural and historical significance well presented in the report demonstrate the urgent need for the building to be designated a historic landmark by the Boston Landmarks Commission.” Comments can even be something as simple as “I love this building - please protect it!” You can leave a comment about the report HERE.

THIRD - Please WRITE AN EMAIL OR LETTER urging the Landmarks Commission to designate Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross Blue Shield Building as a local landmark to blc@boston.gov.

A sample letter is below. If you send a letter or email, please copy it to our email at office@paulrudolph.institute. You can also mail copies to our office at the following address:

The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture
246 East 58th Street New York, NY 10022

SAMPLE LETTER

Brad Walker, Chair

Boston Landmarks Commission
20 City Hall Avenue
3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02108
Email: 
blc@boston.gov

Re: Landmark Designation of Paul Rudolph's Blue Cross - Blue Shield Building

Dear Chair Walker,

I write to you to support the landmark designation of Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building at 133 Federal Street in the Central Business District of Boston. 

One of the first examples of the Brutalist style constructed in Boston, this property reflects Rudolph's ideas about modernism and his response to the increasing use of the glass curtain wall in modern architecture at the time.

I urge the Commission to consider this historic property's architectural value and its special position as one of only three structures designed by Paul Rudolph in the City of Boston. 

I therefore ask that the Blue Cross-Blue Shield Building be designated a landmark so that it may be preserved and protected in perpetuity.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your support of landmark preservation in Boston.

Sincerely,
Name
Address

FINALLY - PLEASE attend the online public hearing. Here’s how to attend:

WHEN - TUESDAY, December 12th at 4:00 PM.
The Meeting will begin at 4:00pm, with public testimony expected to begin at 5:00pm. Please make sure you join before 5:00pm!

WHERE - This hearing will be held virtually and not in person. To participate, please use one of the following:

Thank you for your support of preserving Paul Rudolph's legacy!

Thank you for supporting us at NYC's Landmark Preservation Commission

Members of the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture with Liz Waytkus, Executive Director of Docomomo US (2nd from right) following the public hearing in support of landmarking Paul Rudolph’s Modulightor Building

Thank you to everyone who attended in person, spoke via zoom, and submitted letters of support at yesterday’s public hearing of New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission.

There was broad support for designating our headquarters - Paul Rudolph’s Modulightor Building - as a New York City landmark. Once approved, the building will become the youngest landmark in New York City!

The proposal received 28 letters of support by the time of the hearing (and we’ve received more since!)

Several former Rudolph clients and current property owners were joined by organizations such as the Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, DocomomoUS and its local New York/Tristate Chapter, Iconic Houses, the Neutra Institute for Survival Through Design, US Modernist, the NY Center For Architecture, the Museum of Modern Art and the NYC LGBT Historic Sites Project in sending letters in support of the designation. Former Rudolph students, employees and fans from around the United States and the world also wrote the commission urging it to make Modulightor a landmark.

Thank you to everyone for your support in our effort to landmark our building! We are especially thankful for the people who mentioned the need to landmark the Rudolph-designed interior duplex apartment when it is eligible.

Ernst Wagner - representing Paul Rudolph’s Estate - was at the hearing in person and said later ‘Paul was looking down and is pleased.’

We’ve got a lot planned for the coming year, and thanks to everyone for making this year especially memorable!

NYC's Landmark Preservation Commission to vote on landmarking Rudolph's Modulightor Building

Following a unanimous vote to calendar Paul Rudolph’s Modulightor Building as a potential New York City landmark, the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the proposed designation of the Modulightor Building as a New York City individual landmark on Tuesday, November 28, 2023, at 9:30 A.M.

The public is invited to attend this hearing to present information or testimony relating to the proposed designation. The time allotted for each speaker is three minutes.

The public hearing will be held in the public hearing room at 1 Centre Street, 9th Floor, Borough of Manhattan.

Participation through the video conferencing application Zoom is also available. Please check the hearing page on LPC’s website (https://www.nyc.gov/site/lpc/hearings/hearings.page) for updated hearing information and guidance. Public notice of the hearing identifying the proposed individual landmark will appear in the City Record of November 13, 2023, until November 27, 2023. The public hearing agenda will also be posted on LPC’s website.

If you wish to provide testimony related to the proposed designation, you are encouraged to sign up on the hearings page in advance of the public hearing and you may provide written testimony by emailing testimony@lpc.nyc.gov.

Participation by videoconference may be available as well. Please check the hearing page on LPC’s website (https://www.nyc.gov/site/lpc/hearings/hearings.page) for updated hearing information.

The final order and estimated times for each application will be posted on the Landmarks Preservation Commission website the Friday before the hearing. Please note that the order and estimated times are subject to change. An overflow room is located outside of the primary doors of the public hearing room.

Members of the public not attending in person can observe the meeting on LPC’s YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/nyclpc and may testify on particular matters by joining the meeting using either the Zoom app or by calling in from any phone. Specific instructions on how to observe and testify, including the meeting ID and password, and the call-in number, will be posted on the agency’s website, on the Monday before the public hearing.

New York City's Landmark Preservation Commission to consider landmarking Rudolph's Modulightor Building

In 2019 The Paul Rudolph Estate and the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (PRIMA, then known as the Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation) filed a Request For Evaluation of Paul Rudolph’s Modulightor building as a New York City landmark with the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission is responsible for identifying and designating the special buildings and sites that represent the architectural, historical and cultural heritage of New York City. The Commission’s Research Department accepts suggestions from the public regarding potential historic resources throughout the five boroughs. If a property appears to rise to the level of significance necessary to be considered for Landmark designation, the agency may conduct additional research, and may recommend it for consideration by the Commission.

Following subsequent conversations with PRIMA about the Commission’s interest in considering the Modulightor Building as a potential New York City landmark, the Commission plans to move forward in the designation process by holding a vote on October 3rd, 2023 to decide whether to calendar the building for a future public hearing.

Calendaring is the first formal step in the process for considering a building for designation. If the site is calendared, a public hearing will be scheduled so that all interested parties, including property owners and their representatives, relevant community boards, elected officials, community groups and members of the public can testify or submit written testimony regarding the proposed designation.

The Modulightor Building’s remarkable front and rear elevations are composed of intersecting and overlapping horizontal and vertical rectangles of varying projection and size. Painted white, the steel I-beams form jigsaw-like screens that recall the De Stijl movement, Russian Constructivism, and Mies van der Rohe, as well a Rudolph’s celebrated Milam Residence of 1959-1961.
— "The Modulightor Building" brief prepared by the Research Department of the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission

You can download a copy of the LPC calendar showing the Modulightor Building as item #2 on the agenda here.
 
Here’s how to attend the meeting:

WHEN
TUESDAY, October 3rd at 9:30 AM

WHERE
The public hearing room at 1 Centre Street, 9th Floor, in the Borough of Manhattan.

Participation by videoconference may be available as well. Please check the hearing page on LPC’s website (https://www.nyc.gov/site/lpc/hearings/hearings.page) for updated hearing information.

The final order and estimated times for each application will be posted on the Landmarks Preservation Commission website the Friday before the hearing. Please note that the order and estimated times are subject to change. An overflow room is located outside of the primary doors of the public hearing room.

Members of the public not attending in person can observe the meeting on LPC’s YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/nyclpc and may testify on particular matters by joining the meeting using either the Zoom app or by calling in from any phone. Specific instructions on how to observe and testify, including the meeting ID and password, and the call-in number, will be posted on the agency’s website, on the Monday before the public hearing.

The Paul Rudolph Estate And The Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture Announce Settlement With The Paul Rudolph Foundation

NEW YORK, NY (July 21, 2023) –The Paul Rudolph Estate and The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (”PRIMA”) today announced a settlement with the Paul Rudolph Foundation.

In 2020, the Paul Rudolph Foundation brought an action against PRIMA (formerly known as the Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation) and Mr. Ernst Wagner, Paul Rudolph’s Executor and residuary beneficiary, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties have agreed to settle all claims in the matter with the terms of the settlement being confidential.

Part of the Lawsuit involved the ownership and copyright status of works authored by Paul Rudolph or his architectural office.

In his will, Paul Rudolph gave his Architectural Archives (collectively “Paul Rudolph Works”) to the Library of Congress Trust Fund following his death in 1997. A Stipulation of Settlement signed on June 6, 2001 between the Paul Rudolph Estate and the Library of Congress Trust Fund resulted in the transfer to the Library of Congress of those items among the Paul Rudolph Works that the Library of Congress determined suitable for its collections. These items became the Paul Rudolph Collection at the Library of Congress.

The Court ruled that Paul Rudolph Works in the Paul Rudolph Collection at the Library of Congress are in the public domain. The Paul Rudolph Foundation, Inc. v. Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation et. al, 2022 WL 4109723, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 8, 2022).

The Court also acknowledged that since the Library of Congress did not select the entirety of the Paul Rudolph Works, materials not in the Library’s Collection may not be in the public domain and Mr. Wagner may hold intellectual property rights to this material as the residuary beneficiary of Mr. Rudolph’s estate.  Id. at *7, n.4.

“The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture is dedicated to communicating, preserving and extending the legacy of world renowned architect Paul Marvin Rudolph,” said Kelvin Dickinson, President of PRIMA.  “We welcome the court’s decision that the Paul Rudolph Works at the Library of Congress are dedicated to the public so that his work is preserved and can be celebrated by future generations.”

Ernst Wagner, Executor of the Paul Rudolph Estate stated, “It is the common objective of the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture and the Estate of Paul Rudolph to carry out Rudolph’s wish to preserve and publicize his professional architectural career.  This settlement will allow everyone to move forward to increase the appreciation, understanding, accessibility, study and preservation of Rudolph’s architectural career.”                          

About the Paul Rudolph Estate

Ernst Wagner, a personal friend of Paul Rudolph and owner of Modulightor, a lighting company founded by Mr. Rudolph, is both the Executor of Paul Rudolph’s will and the beneficiary of his estate.

About the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture

The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture is a New York City-based non-profit 501(c)3 organization founded by Ernst Wagner to fulfill Paul Rudolph’s wish that an organization be created to preserve his architectural legacy.  Through preservation and advocacy efforts, educational initiatives, public events and maintaining and developing an archive of written and graphic materials, the Institute seeks to communicate the legacy of this unique American architect in a larger architectural and cultural context to interested students, journalists, scholars, and the general public. 

For more information about the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture, visit www.paulrudolph.institute and find them on Threads (@PaulRudolphInst), Twitter (@PaulRudolphInst), Facebook (@PaulRudolphInst) and Instagram (@PaulRudolphInst).

Download the press release here.

Humanizing the Contextual Environment: Rudolph's Solution to a Crisis of National Style

The Argument for Classicism:

The intersection of architecture and politics is a topic that has received considerable attention recently, as Indiana Representative Jim Banks attempts to re-mandate former President Trump's executive order, advocating for classical architecture in federal buildings. Bank’s proposal, titled “Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act,” seeks to reinstate Trump’s late executive order to establish a national precedent for government architecture, hoping to “make federal government buildings beautiful again.”

Trump's initial statement contained several overt attacks on modern architecture, calling federal buildings constructed over the last 50 years to be “undistinguished, uninspiring, and just plain ugly,” making specific references to Morphosis’s "San Francisco Federal Building" as one of the “ugliest structures in the city”.

San Francisco Government Building designed by Morphosis Architects.

Banks shares his allegiance to “traditional architecture”, while expanding on the previous order, stating that he hopes for an advocacy of a plurality of “American styles” such as “Gothic, Romanesque, Pueblo Revival, Spanish Colonial, and Mediterranean” reflected in government buildings.

Another champion of the conservative effort and previous chair of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, Justin Shubow, comments that “it is crucial that the design of federal buildings reflects the preferences of ordinary Americans” stating that classical architecture accurately represents these ideals.

Rudolph’s Beliefs & Urbanism:

While disregarding the conservative notion, Rudolph similarly believed in a series of principles about architecture– that a building should respond to the “spirit of the times” through architectural effects such as site, function, space, and material. He labeled these as the ‘DNA’ of architecture, allowing a space to become timeless and ultimately transform with the landscape.

Of this rubric he created, he ultimately found two important design ingredients to which his spaces should respond: the internal control of light and space in a memorable manner and the external influence of the surrounding context on a design. As many of Rudolph’s designs were built in an urban environment, he labeled this contextual responsiveness as “urbanism.”

Contextual Responsiveness:

In a socio-political context, however, the ‘urbanism’ of government architecture retains an important role in setting a tone for its surroundings. In Rudolph’s own designs, the Boston Government Service Center begins to hint at spatial unification of three separate state buildings - for employment/social security; outpatient mental health services; and health, education and welfare. Resulting from his design, was a building that read as:

“A single entity rather than three separate buildings. In terms of urban design, this is undoubtedly one of the first concerted efforts to unify a group of buildings that this country has seen in a number of years.” — Paul Rudolph in "Another Major Project for Boston." Progressive Architecture (February 1964)

The Boston Government Service Center designed by Paul Rudolph in 1971. The drawing illustrates the separation of interior from exterior spaces as partitions wrap throughout the open pavilion. Rudolph maintains three distinct scales— human use, structural elements, and the building as a whole.

Balancing Ornamentation and Innovation:

In his efforts to create an architectural language that transcended time and style, Rudolph effectively creates a middle ground between classicism and the “undistinguished modern architecture” often found in postmodern examples.

In his time, Rudolph rejected the current postmodern philosophies, believing them to be superficial, tainted by eclecticism, and ultimately a “summation of architectural styles to reinstate decoration”. He believed however, that decoration existed in modern architecture via the manipulation of scale, material, and space. Without traditional forms of ornamentation, Rudolph created a new form of decorative architecture, universal and reflective of a constantly evolving society.

This new form of detail retained its meaning without an overly literal representation of egalitarianism, prestige, and power. His acceptance of the need to include ornamentation in modern architecture stemmed from the need to humanize the building with identifiable details, producing a scale to which people could relate. To Rudolph, buildings were used space formed to satisfy people’s psychological needs.

Inside the Boston Government Service Center. This picture shows Rudolph’s attention to the relationship between the human scale and the built environment, with texture serving as an identifiable reference for relatability to the space.

In spaces like the San Francisco Federal Building, however, the mechanical ornamentation on the facade of the building lacks any symbolic character. Instead, it begins to convey a totalitarian message, with its arbitrary metallic elements resembling a machine. Inconsiderate of scale as a necessary component for ornamentation the building becomes cold and lifeless, unable to express necessary elements of government architecture.

The design of government buildings require both principles of contextual symbolism and meaningful ornamentation, in which Rudolph’s approach to design poses a solution. Spatial organization, material, and scale all become means to convey decoration, evolving with a dynamic landscape yet still remaining as a space relatable to the human scale.

Frank Gehry’s Deconstructivist style Disney Concert Hall finished in 2003.

Burj Al Babas, an abandoned residential development located near Mudurnu, Turkey. There are 732 nearly identical houses, each designed to resemble a miniature chateau. The project was abandoned in 2019 after the developers filed for bankruptcy with a debt of $25 million.

Preservation Alert: How you can be a part of today's Landmark Commission meeting about the Halston Residence

UPDATE: today’s meeting at the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission will be virtual.

After rejection by the Full Board of Community Board 8, a proposal to alter the front facade of the Alexander Hirsch/Halston Residence will go before the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission this afternoon for a ‘certificate of appropriateness’

You can download a copy of the LPC calendar showing it as item #13 on the agenda here.
 
The project number is LPC-23-07040 and the public is encouraged to attend and speak out against this proposal.

Here’s how to attend the public hearing so you can voice your opposition to this proposal:

WHEN
TODAY at 2:45 PM (exact timing of item is expected around 3:45 PM)

WHERE
Today’s February 28, 2023 Public Hearing/Meeting WILL BE VIRTUAL. Read below on how to join:

Join the Zoom meeting using the link below:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82889856536?pwd=bHpRcnlQQ2dXczEwWUdTa1JRSGpPQT09 

Or Dial in using the numbers below
646 558 8656 US (New York)
877 853 5257 US Toll-free
888 475 4499 US Toll-free

Webinar ID: 828 8985 6536
Passcode: 534310

See instructions for participating in the virtual public hearings/meetings below.

Instructions for Participating in Virtual LPC Public Hearings/Meetings
Instrucciones para participar en vistas públicas/reuniones virtuales de LPC (Español/Spanish)
参加纽约市地标保护委员会(LPC)虚拟听证会及会议说明 (简体中文/ Simplified Chinese)
參加紐約市地標保護委員會(LPC)虛擬聽證會及會議說明 (繁體中文/Traditional Chinese)

If you have any concerns about access to and/or participating in the LPC’s virtual hearings, please contact Sonia Guior, Director of Community and Intergovernmental Affairs, at sguior@lpc.nyc.gov and they will work with you to make accommodations.

Community Board votes to reject changes to Rudolph's landmarked Halston Residence facade

Image: Engel & Völkers

PRESERVATION UPDATE

On Monday, February 13, the Landmarks Committee of New York City Community Board 8 unanimously passed the following resolution regarding the proposed changes to Paul Rudolph’s legendary Halston Residence:

101 East 63rd Street (Upper East Side Historic District) Steve Blatz, Architect. Valerie Campbell, Kramer Levin. A stable and residence originally constructed in 1881 but altered in 1966-68 by Paul Rudolph as a single-family home. Application is to alter an existing entrance recess.

WHEREAS 101 East 63rd Street was originally constructed in 1881 as a stable-residence;

WHEREAS in 1966-1968, the property was significantly altered by Paul Rudolph, the famed modernist architect and a former dean of the Yale School of Architecture;

WHEREAS 101 East 63rd Street is referenced in the 4th edition of the AIA Guide to New York City as follows: “A somber brown steel and dark glass grid gives an understated face to a dramatic set of domestic spaces within.”

WHEREAS the existing garage door is set back 3 1/2’ from the property line;

WHEREAS the entrance door is set back an additional 4’ (7 1/2’ from property line) with a canopy over it; the applicant feels that the entrance door attracts vagrants and refuse;

WHEREAS the applicant proposes pulling the entrance door forward 2’; the 3 existing down lights at the entrance would disappear; there would be a recessed slot above the door to provide lighting for the new entrance;

WHEREAS the most important aspect of 101 East 63rd Street is the way the building steps back from the lot line to the entrance;

WHEREAS the three down lights provide character and a lighting scheme for the space at the front entrance;

WHEREAS the not-always-friendly nature of Paul Rudolph’s work must be respected; the house is one of only three that Paul Rudolph designed in Manhattan;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that this application is DISAPPROVED as presented.

VOTE: 7 In Favor (Baron, Birnbaum, Camp, Cohn, Helpern, Parshall, Tamayo) ; One Public Member In Favor (Selway)

At Wednesday night’s Full Board Meeting, Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture President Kelvin Dickinson spoke during the opening public session and thanked the members of the Landmarks Committee for the unanimous decision and requested the full board do the same. He noted that three of the committee’s members are architects, all of whom supported the resolution to reject the proposed changes to the landmark façade.

Following little discussion except for acknowledgement that the project would likely ‘get noticed in the press’ the members of the Full Board voted to pass the resolution with a few members abstaining.

What Happens Next

The proposal will now go before the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission on February 28, 2023 for a ‘certificate of appropriateness’

You can download a copy of the LPC calendar showing it as item #13 on the agenda here.

The project number is LPC-23-07040 and the public is encouraged to attend and speak out against this proposal.

SAVE THE DATE!

Here’s how to attend the public hearing so you can voice your opposition to this proposal:

WHEN
On Tuesday, February 28, 2023, at 9:30 AM

WHERE
The public hearing room at 1 Centre Street, 9th Floor, Borough of Manhattan, and the meeting will also be live-streamed and open to public participation by teleconference.

The final order and estimated times for each application will be posted on the Landmarks Preservation Commission website the Friday before the hearing. Please note that the order and estimated times are subject to change. An overflow room is located outside of the primary doors of the public hearing room.

What if I can’t go in person?

Virtual attendance by the public is encouraged given the continuing presence of COVID and the desire to facilitate social distancing. Any person requiring reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the hearing or attend the meeting should contact the Landmarks Commission no later than five (5) business days before the hearing or meeting. Members of the public not attending in person can observe the meeting on LPC’s YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/nyclpc and may testify on particular matters by joining the meeting using either the Zoom app or by calling in from any phone. Specific instructions on how to observe and testify, including the meeting ID and password, and the call-in number, will be posted on the agency’s website, under the “Hearings” tab https://www1.nyc.gov/site/lpc/hearings/hearings.page, on the Monday before the public hearing.

Preservation Alert: Tom Ford proposes changes to facade Of Iconic Halston Residence


The restrained exterior elevation of the house, originally designed by Paul Rudolph in 1966-1967—purchased by Halston in 1974, and now a home for Tom Ford. Photo: Homedsgn.com

AN URGENT PRESERVATION UPDATE:

A proposal was submitted at yesterday’s Community Board 8 Landmarks Committee Meeting by Steve Blatz of Steve Blatz Architect to alter the existing façade of 101 East 63rd street, known as the Hirsch Residence and also the Halston Residence.

A copy of the presentation submitted at yesterday’s meeting is available for download here.

The Community Board 8 Landmarks Committee & What Happened

The Landmarks Committee of Community Board 8 reviews Certificate of Appropriateness applications, designations, and related matters for the individual landmarks and buildings within the six historic districts in the Board 8 area in New York City. This committee meets every month on the Monday before the Full Board meeting, unless otherwise noted.

An archived copy of the Public Hearing agenda for Monday February 13, 2023 can be found here.

According to our sources, the committee voted to reject the proposed changes.

What’s Next - How you can help!

Now, it will go before the full Community Board meeting tomorrow night.

The Full Board of CB8 meets monthly on the third Wednesday of each month (tomorrow!), reviewing recommendations made by committees and voted on them for final approval. Each meeting starts with public session, where constituents have 3 minutes to comment on issues coming to the board or express any issues or concerns effecting the community.

Additionally, a list of the CB8 Board Members can be found here.

What are the proposed changes to the Hirsch / Halston Residence?

According to the presentation submitted at yesterday’s meeting (available for download here) the proposal is to make changes to the façade at the recessed entrance to the building.

The plan of the existing recessed front entrance. Drawing from the CB8 presentation.

The plan of the proposed shallower front entrance. Note the hole cut in the existing façade for a new hose bib. Drawing from the CB8 presentation.

Note the entrance door is removed and pulled forward two feet. Drawing from the CB8 presentation.

Rudolph’s rendering of the Hirsch Residence façade published in the New York Times on February 19, 1967.

How to make an ‘Entrance’ - according to Rudolph

The effect of this change will remove Rudolph’s original intention to recess and obscure the residential entrance from the street.

In many of his projects, Rudolph intentionally recessed the building entrance so that visitors had to discover where to access the world he had created beyond. He would suggest as a clue, through a series of peeled ‘reveals’ or an oversized opening, that the entrance could be found if a passerby were to explore them further.

Several examples of this are the Sarasota High School, the Yale Art & Architecture building (now Rudolph Hall) and our own headquarters at the Modulightor building - shown below:

In the case of the Halston Residence, not only will the relocated door inappropriately align with the structure of the floor above giving it a flattened appearance, but the recessed lighting above the door will be altered, changing the appearance of the façade at night.

Ezra Stoller’s photo illustrating the deep shadows cast over the recessed door which will be lost if the door is pulled forward.

Who has the final say - the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission

After the Full Board Meeting of Community Board 8, the proposal will ultimately go before the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission on February 28, 2023 for a ‘certificate of appropriateness’

You can download a copy of the LPC calendar showing it as item #13 on the agenda here.

The project number is LPC-23-07040 and the public is encouraged to attend and speak out against this proposal.

SAVE THE DATE!

Here’s how to attend the public hearing so you can voice your opposition to this proposal:

WHEN
On Tuesday, February 28, 2023, at 9:30 AM

WHERE
The public hearing room at 1 Centre Street, 9th Floor, Borough of Manhattan, and the meeting will also be live-streamed and open to public participation by teleconference.

The final order and estimated times for each application will be posted on the Landmarks Preservation Commission website the Friday before the hearing. Please note that the order and estimated times are subject to change. An overflow room is located outside of the primary doors of the public hearing room.

What if I can’t go in person?

Virtual attendance by the public is encouraged given the continuing presence of COVID and the desire to facilitate social distancing. Any person requiring reasonable accommodation in order to participate in the hearing or attend the meeting should contact the Landmarks Commission no later than five (5) business days before the hearing or meeting. Members of the public not attending in person can observe the meeting on LPC’s YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/nyclpc and may testify on particular matters by joining the meeting using either the Zoom app or by calling in from any phone. Specific instructions on how to observe and testify, including the meeting ID and password, and the call-in number, will be posted on the agency’s website, under the “Hearings” tab https://www1.nyc.gov/site/lpc/hearings/hearings.page, on the Monday before the public hearing.

So - How did we get here?

A lot of publications mentioned Tom Ford’s 2019 purchase and his plan to restore the interiors at the time. For those of you who want to know more, we are republishing excerpts from our previous blog posts below:

A House with a History

Paul Rudolph designed the original residence at 101 East 63rd street for Mr. Alexander Hirsch in 1966. He created a Modernist oasis for his client, an intensely private person who wanted a place to escape to while still being in the heart of Manhattan. As Rudolph later described the project in Sibyl Moholy-Nagy’s 1970 book, The Architecture of Paul Rudolph:

A world of its own, inward looking and secretive, is created in a relatively small volume of space in the middle of New York City. Varying intensities of light are juxtaposed and related to structures within structures. Simple materials (plaster, paint) are used, but the feeling is of great luxuriousness because of the space. The one exposed façade reveals the interior arrangement of volumes by offsetting each floor and room in plan and section.

The house later went from being a private refuge to a celebrity hot spot known for its notorious parties when it was sold to the fashion designer Halston in the 1970’s. Halston himself spoke about the space in a documentary about his life that was featured on CNN:

I’m Halston and this is my home. The architect was Paul Rudolph and the day I saw it, I bought it. Its the only real modern house built in the city of New York since the second world war. Its like living in a three dimensional sculpture.

For more information about the design of the original house, you can find drawings and photos of it on our project page here.

A Buyer as Famous as the House

As we reported in a previous blog post in March of 2019, the house was sold to fashion designer Tom Ford after being on the market for a number of years. The sale, first reported in an article in Women’s Wear Daily after being the subject of rumors for a few weeks, was reported across social media and the design community. Articles appeared in Garage, Vogue, GQ, Mansion Global, the Daily Mail and New York Times.

Halston had hired Rudolph to renovate the space when he bought it. Wall to wall grey carpet, mirrored and Plexiglas furniture and chain-mail curtains were installed as a result. Members of the design community were pleased to learn that Tom Ford intended to restore the interior to the glamour that many remembered.

A Restoration, or Renovation?

Shortly before the 2019 sale was announced, we were approached by Mr. Ford’s architect, Atmosphere Design Group, to obtain copies of Rudolph’s original drawings. We were told ‘the client’ wanted to restore the interiors.

We asked the architect to consider consulting with the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture during the design process to ensure the design was faithful to Mr. Rudolph’s original vision. They said they would consider it and were never heard from again. Given the architect is generally known for Mr. Ford’s retail store design, we were concerned when we learned a demolition permit was issued in August, 2019.

Following the CNN documentary, Netflix announced that it too was going to do a story about Halston and were scouting locations to use for filming. Netflix location scouts visited us in the Rudolph-designed apartment at Modulightor and we spoke to them about Mr. Ford’s proposed changes and they said they would call us after seeing the original home for themselves. That was followed by the New York Times publishing the Halston interior as #19 on its ‘25 Rooms that Influence the Way We Design

As the iconic interior continued to be in the news, we waited to see what was being done to the space.

Then we got a call - “The space is gutted, Its unrecognizable.

As we reported here in May, 2021 the proposed changes did not match the architect’s description to us.

At the time, the changes were interior modifications - the usual kitchen and bathroom updates. However we noted an ominous note on one of the drawings:

Note the garage door is dotted on the demolition plan, with a note calling for it to be replaced. Drawing by Atmosphere Design Group, from the NYC DOB.

Despite being in a landmark district - and signed off by the Landmark’s Commission as having no affect on the building exterior - the drawings showed the original garage door was planned to be removed and replaced.

Little did anyone know that less than two years later, Mr. Ford would submit plans to modify the facade of the landmark building.

Hurricane Ian threatens Rudolph's Florida legacy as Residents Evacuate

By Wednesday night or Thursday morning, the National Weather Service projects that Ian will hit Manatee County, just north of Sarasota. Siesta Key, Longboat Key, Casey Key and Anna Maria are facing mandatory evacuations, restricted entry, and water will be shut off to prevent damage to the county's water system infrastructure.

According to the local Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Sarasota County called for evacuations starting yesterday. All residents in evacuation zones A and B (red and orange areas below) are under a mandatory evacuation, which includes anyone living in a mobile home. Residents living in evacuation zone C are strongly recommended to evacuate.

Evacuation centers are opening, including one at the new Riverview High School which replaced Rudolph’s original 1957 building that was demolished in 2009.

Sarasota County Evacuation Levels

Sarasota has faced significant storms in the past, but the last hurricane to directly hit the region was Category 3 Hurricane Donna in 1960. In 1966, the pavilion roof of Rudolph’s Umbrella Residence was blown off the house by winds from nearby Hurricane Alma. It was eventually rebuilt in 2011.

We wish everyone to stay safe and have spoken to friends in the area about the ongoing situation.

Some of Rudolph’s notable structures in the area threatened by Hurricane Ian are the following:

DocomomoUS and the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture’s Response to the Proposed Modifications to Rudolph's Boston Government Center

On August 24, 2022, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts issued an announcement designating Leggat McCall Properties as the redevelopment partner for the Charles F. Hurley Building also known as the Boston Government Services Center. You can read a copy of the announcement here.

After reviewing the announcement and the renderings attached to it, DocomomoUS and The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture issued the following joint press release:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Kelvin Dickinson

E: office@paulrudolph.institute

P: 917-242-0652

Docomomo US and The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (PRIMA) are jointly responding to the August 24, 2022, announcement by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on the designation of Leggat McCall Properties as the redevelopment partner for the Charles F. Hurley Building also known as the Boston Government Services Center originally designed by the world-renown architect Paul Rudolph and opened in 1971.

We see the announcement and the attached renderings as just one step in the process of determining the best outcome for the Hurley building and the overall site. We are frustrated that the proposal does not fully preserve and restore the site that the Massachusetts Historical Commission describes as a “significant cultural resource.” The proposal lacks many details in terms of just how much of the original building and its significant features will be removed. While the proposal does not call for total demolition of the building, we will continue to ask the state to maintain as much of the original fabric as possible.

From the current renderings, the two new towers do not seem compatible with one another or the historic building (different materials, colors, and massing) and appear to be separate blocks that have “landed” on the Hurley rather than integrate with the original structure or each other. Our suggestion would be that the team consider reviewing Paul Rudolph’s original design guidelines for the site and work to better integrate any new construction with that methodology.

We are pleased to see the street wall that faces Staniford Street maintains the look and feel of the original design and retains the site's character defining features including the massive colonnade of concrete piers.

We anticipate seeing improved and expanded details that will show how the proposal respects the cultural heritage of the site. From the minimal details provided: the landscaping does not go far enough to be respectful; the announcement included no mention of the conservation of the Costantino Nivola murals; the proposal lacks to a description of how the parking garage will be integrated; nor does the announcement detail the Lindemann stairs that were said to be restored with this proposal.

Speaking on behalf of Docomomo US, Liz Waytkus stated that, “The interventions at the Government Center need to harmonize with the historic site. The announcement yesterday lacked a lot of information as to how that is going to happen. Docomomo US will continue to follow along and engage in this process."

"Rudolph's building is a monument to the government's service to its people and their confidence in the future of Boston," said Kelvin Dickinson, President of The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture. "Using spatial motifs that reference Boston's historic connection to the sea, the Government Center is a unique symbol of its time and place. The revisions proposed in yesterday's announcement need to better show how they are consistent with the design guidelines Rudolph established for the site. The Paul Rudolph Institute will follow and encourage this throughout the design process."

###

You can download a copy of this press release here.

Introducing the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture

Paul Rudolph’s representation of the human figure used as the logo for the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture.

The Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation and the Paul Rudolph Estate are excited to announce the launch of the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture.

The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (PRIMA) will replace the Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation and expand its mission to provide outreach and information to educators, students, design professionals and the broader public interested in learning about the design principles of modern architecture exemplified in Paul Rudolph’s architectural work and teachings.

“Principles are principles. Principles don’t change. Styles change; attitudes change. Things are in a constant state of flux. The only grasp one can have on the profession is to get a handle on great principles.” - Paul Rudolph

Rudolph referred to these principles as the ‘DNA’ of architecture and they include issues of site, function, space, structure/materials, scale and style (referred to as the spirit of the times). These principles are timeless and are not just found in Rudolph’s own buildings: they are not restricted to any one style of construction, location or material.

“Modern architecture’s range of expression is today from A to B. We build isolated buildings with no regard to the space between them, monotonous and endless streets, too many goldfish bowls, too few caves. We tend to build merely diagrams of buildings.”

”One can say that the present tendency to reduce everything to a system of rectangles, both in plan and elevation, is an outgrowth of the modular concept and machine processes. We accept this discipline but we still long innately for the old play of light and shadow, for something curved.” - Paul Rudolph

Rudolph realized that for architecture to be successful, it must solve modern problems and reflect modern times with a respect for a traditional way of seeing and feeling space.

“People, if they think about architecture at all, usually think in terms of the materials. While that’s important, it’s not the thing that determines the psychology of the building. It’s really the compression and release of space, the lighting of that space—dark to light—and the progression of one space to another. Because one remembers in that sense.” - Paul Rudolph

As architecture and design adapt to the changing needs of our modern world - sustainability and climate change; urbanism; affordable housing to name a few - these principles can help us to design and build a better future that keeps and learns from the best of the past.

The New York City-based non-profit 501(c)3 organization was founded by Ernst Wagner, Paul Rudolph’s heir and executor of his estate, to fulfill Rudolph’s wish that an organization be created to preserve and educate others about his architectural legacy. The Institute will promote Rudolph’s design principles through preservation and advocacy efforts, educational programs, public events and maintaining and developing an archive of materials related to modern architecture.

The Institute’s logo is Rudolph’s representation of a human figure in the pen and ink drawings that made his work celebrated around the world. It represents Rudolph’s humanistic view of architecture that emphasizes the power of human beings to create, improve, and reshape their environment with the aid of scientific knowledge, technology and practical experimentation.

Rudolph described architecture as “used space formed to satisfy people’s psychological needs.” This definition places the user at the center of architectural experience and considers human beings as the starting point for any architectural philosophical inquiry.

The Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture will continue to act as the exclusive worldwide representative for The Estate of Paul Rudolph LLC with regard to licensing third parties for any and all uses of the intellectual property rights of the Works of Paul Rudolph.

If you are interested in becoming involved with the work of the Paul Rudolph Institute, or to find out more about our programs as they develop, please complete the “Contact Us” form and note your interest in this work so we may contact you.