Architect's Newspaper

AN remembers the architects, designers, educators, mentors, and writers we lost in 2024

AN remembers the architects, designers, educators, mentors, and writers we lost in 2024

Architect’s Newspaper
Daniel Jonas Roche - December 23, 2024

A trailblazing African American architect in St. Louis. A world-renowned philosopher of postmodernism. Famous artists who worked with famous architects. Le Corbusier’s last living employee. A legendary downtown New York fashion designer. A U.S. President.

These are just a few brief descriptors of the visionary architects, educators, designers, artists, and writers who died in 2024 for whom AN published obituaries or tributes. See the names of the individuals listed below, and click to read more about their life and impact on the built environment.

Jimmy Carter, 100

39th U.S. President, Habitat for Humanity worker, National Park Service champion, environmentalist

Victor Lundy, 101

Designer, artist, and Sarasota School of Architecture pioneer

Joseph Rykwert, 98

Architectural historian

Iris Apfel, 102

Interior designer, furniture maker

Richard Serra, 85

Artist

Fredric Jameson, 90

Philosopher; professor; author of Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism

Barbara Stauffacher Solomon, 95

“California cool” graphic design visionary, landscape architect

Ralph Knowles, 95

Passive design pioneer

Milton Barragán Dumet, 90

Ecuadorian architect, educator, artist

Rene Gonzalez Ilustre, 84

California architect who worked for Frank Gehry

Charles Fleming, 86

St. Louis modern architect

Fumihiko Maki, 95

Pritzker Prize–winning Metabolist architect

Marsha Ann Maytum, 69

Founding principal of Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects, design justice advocate

Frank Stella, 87

Artist

Paul Auster, 77

Author, playwright

Gaetano Pesce, 84

Designer, architect

Debora K. Reiser, 96

Long Island modern architect, educator, mentor

Ernst Wagner

Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture founder

Yoshio Taniguchi, 87

Architect, leader of MoMA expansion

Jeffrey Beers, 67

Architect

José Oubrerie, 91

Architect, professor, former employee of Le Corbusier

Charles Thornton, 83

Engineer, cofounder of Thornton Tomasetti

Curtis Moody, 73

Founder of Moody Nolan, the country’s largest African American–owned architecture firm

Kurt Forster, 89

Scholar, professor, historian

Antoine Predock, 87

Architect, educator, artist

Carl Andre, 88

Minimalist artist, involved in the death of Ana Mendieta in 1985

Juha Ilmari Leiviskä, 87

Finnish architect

Eugene Aubry, 88

Texas architect

Read the original article here.

Two exhibitions showcase Myron Goldfinger’s geometric genius through drawings and models

Two exhibitions showcase Myron Goldfinger’s geometric genius through drawings and models

Architect’s Newspaper
Belmont Freeman - December 19, 2024

Installation view of Circle, Square, Triangle: The Houses I Never Lived In. The Residential Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008. (Kelvin Dickinson/Courtesy the Paul Rudolph Institute For Modern Architecture)

Late 20th-century modern architecture is having its moment in New York this season, beginning with the Paul Rudolph exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a show that I (and others) found rather thin and predictable. More stimulating and unexpected are a pair of exhibitions at the Brutalist master’s namesake venue, the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture (PRIMA), and the Mitchell Algus Gallery: Both showcase the work of the recently deceased Myron Goldfinger, a prolific and singularly talented designer whose portfolio merits and rewards fresh examination.

Circle, Square, Triangle: Houses I Never Lived In. The Residential Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008 at PRIMA’s home in the Rudolph-designed Modulightor building features Goldfinger’s residential projects, which constitute most of his built work. Downtown, the Mitchell Algus Gallery hosts Circle, Square, Triangle: A World I Wanted to Live in. The Public and Unbuilt Work of Myron Goldfinger 1963-2008, which demonstrates Goldfinger’s work on more varied building types and at larger scale.

The shared titling of these exhibitions references Goldfinger’s self-professed infatuation with Platonic geometric form. Strong geometry was an inspiration for many practitioners in the 1960s and ‘70s—think of the New York Five—but Goldfinger’s bold compositions of cubes, cylinders, and triangular blocks take the predilection to near-fetishistic extremes. His best work accrues a monumentality that bears the influence of Louis Kahn, under whom he studied at the University of Pennsylvania (where he was a student also of Paul Rudolph, whom Goldfinger always admired). To my eyes, the clarity of Goldfinger’s designs is a welcome respite after enduring the irrational computer-generated form making that has taken over architectural production in recent years.

Goldfinger grew up in a working-class neighborhood of Atlantic City. After graduating from Penn in 1955, he worked at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and in the office of Philip Johnson before establishing his own practice in 1966. That same year he married June Matkovic, an interior designer who worked alongside him for the duration of his career. Goldfinger made an early splash with the construction of his own home in the woods at Waccabuc, New York; the residence is a towering stack of cubes and triangular volumes clad in vertical cedar siding. The project was selected by the editors of Architectural Record for its 1971 edition of Record Houses.

At the same time, Goldfinger produced a much grander house for June’s parents, sited on the water in Sands Point, New York; the semicircular bays of which were meant to evoke the decks of boats owned by Mr. Matkovic’s shipping company. These early projects were followed by numerous commissions for houses in the New York area and, later, on the island of Anguilla, where Goldfinger became involved in the development of a resort community.

Goldfinger’s geometric compositions with their sharp play of light and shadow are naturally photogenic, and the exhibition at PRIMA includes many black and white images by Norman McGrath. McGrath, who surely knew every architect in town, selected Goldfinger to design his own home in Patterson, New York. The sculptural quality of Goldfinger’s houses is celebrated by several models built for the show by students at Pratt Institute, where Goldfinger taught for many years alongside Sybil Moholy-Nagy.

The photos and models are wonderful, but the stars of these two shows, as at the Rudolph exhibition at The Met, are the drawings. Goldfinger produced exuberant perspectives hand-rendered in pencil that convincingly and expressively place the houses in their sites and reveal the drama of their interiors. For me, seeing these drawings took me back to the mid-1970s when I was in school (at Penn, like Goldfinger) and we tried to emulate the drawing styles of the masters, including Romaldo Giurgola, Steve Izenour (at Venturi, Rauch and Scott-Brown) and, of course, Rudolph.

I applaud the decision by curators Kelvin Dickinson, president of PRIMA, and Eshaan Mehta to include several sheets of pencil-on-vellum working drawings that illustrate Goldfinger’s attention to detail and the handcrafting of architecture by drawing. June Goldfinger told me that while the finished presentation renderings were usually done by studio employees, Goldfinger was intimately involved in the drafting of the working drawings. I am grateful that I learned (at Davis, Brody & Associates) how buildings get built by tracing and adapting construction details and pity today’s interns who learn little more than to copy and paste in AutoCAD.

The mixed-media presentation of Goldfinger’s architecture looks right at home in the hyper-designed, residential-scaled setting on the top two floors of the Modulightor building. In the more conventional loft space of the Mitchell Algus Gallery, Goldfinger’s unbuilt work is, as one would expect, represented by drawings hung museum-style on well-lit walls. For me the stand-out piece is the expansive seagull’s-eye view of Goldfinger’s proposal for a huge residential development on Roosevelt Island, produced in 1975 for a competition that attracted entries by some 250 architects; Goldfinger’s was one of thirty-five published semifinalists. (This rendering and the best of others in the two shows are by Manuel Castedo, who worked for Goldfinger for several years before establishing his own successful practice.) Less dramatic but also ambitious is a series of plans and axonometrics for a system of prefabricated modular housing that recycled the cubic and triangular forms from his own house, illustrating Goldfinger’s interest in economical mass housing.

The twin Circle, Square, Triangle shows initiate a fruitful exploration of Myron Goldfinger’s legacy. It’s also a turning point for PRIMA, which until recently had been called the Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation. With the cataloging, scanning, and display of the Goldfinger archive taking place in-house at PRIMA, with June’s participation, the effort validates its newly broadened mission to identify, study, and advocate for the preservation of the work of other modern architects of Rudolph’s and later generations, most of whom will likely not get exhibitions at The Met like Rudolph but who, like Goldfinger, have much to offer today’s scholars and practitioners.

Belmont Freeman is the founding principal of the New York City–based firm Belmont Freeman Architects.

Read the original article here.

Paul Rudolph’s Sanderling Beach Club destroyed by Tropical Storm Helene

Paul Rudolph’s Sanderling Beach Club destroyed by Tropical Storm Helene

The Architect’s Newspaper
Daniel Jonas Roche - September 27, 2024

The complex was destroyed on September 26. Photo: Max Strang

In the past 72 hours, Tropical Storm Helene has killed at least 22 people. Houses, infrastructure, and roads in Florida have been decimated. Sanderling Beach Club, a 1952 building designed by Paul Rudolph in Sarasota, has also been completely destroyed.

News of Sanderling Beach Club’s destruction was shared by the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture and Docomomo. It was wrecked by strong winds and rain the evening of September 26.

“We are absolutely gutted to see Paul Rudolph’s Sanderling Beach Cabanas in Sarasota, Florida have been completely destroyed by Hurricane Helene,” Docomomo said on Instagram. “This was the site of our first National Symposium in 2013. We knew this day would come but very sad as reality sets in.”

“Paul Rudolph considered his projects like children and once built ‘each has a power and a life of its own.’ The loss of the cabanas at the Sanderling Beach Club is devastating—another example of Rudolph’s genius now exists only in books and photographs,” Kelvin Dickinson, president of the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture, told AN. “We hope there will be—and will fully support—an effort to rebuild the cabanas as Rudolph originally designed them. Until then, it feels like we’ve lost a member of the family.”

Paul Rudolph was 34 years old when he was hired to design Sanderling Beach Club by the Sanderling family, influential Floridian developers who built golf courses. The project on the Siesta Key became known for its cabanas with barrel vaults that go right up to the water. The roofs, Rudolph said, and their curvature were meant to resemble Gulf Coast waves.

A series of additions between 1952 and 1960 transformed the ensemble. Later, the Museum of Modern Art of Sao Paulo, Brazil gave Rudolph an award for Sanderling Beach Club. The project also appeared in The Architecture of Paul Rudolph by Sibyl Moholy-Nagy and Gerhard Schwab, published in 1970.

Sanderling Beach Club was designated on the National Register of Historic Places in 1994. According to architect Max Strang, who has since visited the wreckage, the architecture is completely destroyed, and there is nothing left to repair.

Strang relayed to the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture that he will present a reconstruction plan for Sanderling Beach Club in the future. Meanwhile, a separate residence by Rudolph in Florida has also experienced flooding. But the full extent of damage is still unknown.

The disaster happened just days before a major retrospective on Rudolph opens at the Met in New York.

Read the original article here.

Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross - Blue Shield building declared local landmark by Boston Landmarks Commission

Paul Rudolph’s Blue Cross - Blue Shield building declared local landmark by Boston Landmarks Commission

The Archinect’s Newspaper
Daniel Roche - March 08, 2024

The Boston Landmarks Commission has unanimously voted to declare the Blue Cross – Blue Shield building by Paul Rudolph a local landmark. The announcement comes after years of preservation advocacy to save the Brutalist building, a campaign which started in 2006.

Blue Cross – Blue Shield is a 13-story, 120,000-square-foot concrete tower located at 133 Federal Street in downtown Boston, completed in 1960. It is one of three buildings by Paul Rudolph in the city of Boston, and was the architect’s first tall building.

The Brutalist tower is known for its Y-shaped, precast-concrete piers; columns made of large white quartz aggregate; and a novel HVAC system that’s hidden within non-load bearing columns. Rudolph wanted the building’s opacity and heaviness to challenge the rampant construction of glass curtain wall buildings happening in cities around the U.S.

Rudolph’s project at 133 Federal Street was one of the first new ground-up building in Boston’s central business district since the 1920s, marking a turning point in the city’s history after years of economic stagnation. It was also one of Boston’s first Brutalist buildings. In 1975, Sasaki renovated the tower’s ground level to accommodate a new bank. Its basement-level had numerous uses over the years, including an art gallery.

In 2006, then-Boston Mayor Thomas Menino (who was certainly no fan of Brutalist architecture) proposed demolishing Rudolph’s Blue Cross – Blue Shield building for a new, 75-story “iconic tower” by Renzo Piano. But once preservationists caught wind of the proposition, they took action and requested a 90-day stay of demolition to determine if Blue Cross – Blue Shield is historically significant enough to merit preservation.

The 2007–8 recession then stymied commercial demand for the Piano tower, so demolition plans for Blue Cross – Blue Shield were shelved. After, the Boston Landmarks Commission identified the Blue Cross – Blue Shield building in 2009 as eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places, which opened up the opportunity for a landmark status petition with the city of Boston.

Once the economy bounced back, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) revisited plans to develop the site. The BRA issued an RFP which drew five responses, one of them from Trans National Properties who proposed demolishing Blue Cross – Blue Shield for a twin-tower construction project, in-sync with another development site at 115 Winthrop Square. That project looked like it would come to fruition until it was stopped in 2017.

Flash forward to November 2023, the Boston Landmarks Commission published a study report on Blue Cross – Blue Shield’s proposed designation as a Landmark under Chapter 772 of the Acts of 1975.

The announcement to landmark this Rudolph building comes a few months after another decision by Boston city officials to recommend landmarking another Brutalist building, Boston City Hall by Gerhard Kallmann and Michael McKinnell.

Read the original article here.

Preservation stories that had AN editors buzzing in 2023

Preservation stories that had AN editors buzzing in 2023

The Architect’s Newspaper
Kristine Klein - December 21, 2023

Demolitions. Designations. Decorations. Preservation stories always excite AN readers who often rally around projects by eminent architects slated for the wrecking ball or praise expertly restored ones. This year was no exception. We saw history years-in-the-making play out as several imperiled buildings faced an unfortunate fate, while elsewhere the future of others hang in limbo.

A number of office-to-residential projects mark a shift toward the reuse of buildings, a trend taking hold in cities across the country. From a project to restore the town of a Willie Nelson movie set to a proposed change to move a door 19 inches at a Paul Rudolph–designed townhouse, here are the preservation stories AN covered this year that kept editors and readers on edge.

New York City Planning Commission voted to allow renovation of 60 Wall Street’s postmodern lobby

The beloved 1989 postmodern lobby by Kevin Roche and John Dinkeloo at 60 Wall Street has been a topic of conservation among New York preservation circles for the last few years. In August the city’s planning commission decision to renovate the exquisite example of postmodern design was again met with chagrin by the architecture and preservation community. AN spoke with Docomomo U.S. executive director Liz Waytkus, architecture critic Alexander Lange, and architect Robert M. Stern following the news. Each recalled their disappointment to not maintain the public space, even going on to say more could be done to save it and more emphasis could be placed on the study of postmodern architecture.

SOM’s Baxter International suburban office park lives on

In January, Baxter announced plans to sell its SOM-designed office campus in Deerfield, Illinois , citing supply chain congestion, rising costs, and poor financial performance. The company planned to sell the 101-acre office park to Bridge Industrial with plans to demolish the complex and replace it with a 1.3-million-square-foot warehouse and shipping hub. After much public resistance, primarily from local residents, Bridge withdrew their plans to redevelop the office park in June.

SOM architect Richard Tomlinson believes the Baxter campus’s modular flexibility makes it an ideal candidate for adaptive reuse. And so the suburban behemoth of rectilinear structure connected by skywalks and underground tunnels lives on.

Chicago Tribune Tower converted to residential use

Elsewhere in Chicago another preservation win is the renovation of the storied Tribune Tower. One of several office-to-residential adaptive reuse projects taking hold in the city, the Tribune Tower, first conceived as part of a design competition in 1922, now has a residential purpose. Solomon Cordwell Buenz (SCB) led the redesign, which converted offices into 162 units and 55,000 square feet of amenity space.

The firm maintained as much of the original infrastructure as possible while making minimal interventions. From the outside of the tower not much has changed, with much of the renovation concentred to the interiors where vital infrastructure was updated to make way for new retail spaces and the host of new residential amenity spaces.

In Detroit, ODA converted a historic office tower to hotel and residential use

The office-to-residential pipeline is thriving. In addition to the Tribune Tower, a landmark building in Detroit also underwent a major conversion. Headed by New York–based ODA Architecture, Detroit’s Book Tower has been converted into a hotel, residences, restaurants, and retail.

Restoration was a tedious process that involved preserving the building’s masonry facade, while maintaining the historical integrity of the interiors. A major component, and crowning achievement, of the project was the restoration of the glass skylit atrium. Restoring the glass was akin to piecing together a puzzle. While some glazed elements were cleaned and preserved, others were remade to match speculated versions of what was once there.

Demolition of the Gyo Obata restaurant pavilion made way for the new Bezos Learning Center

The year started out with sadly anticipated demolition of architect Gyo Obata’s glass restaurant pavilion on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. A job designed to make way for the $130 million Bezos Learning Center is slated for construction on the site.

The pyramid-shaped pavilion was built to accommodate school groups and other museum visitors and had been closed since 2017. This year the Smithsonian, who is behind the planned Bezos Learning Center, announced Perkins&Will will design the new structure following five proposals announced in 2022. According to a press release the firm was chosen for its “ample experience designing cultural and education spaces, the composition and credentials of its management team, and the strength of the team’s aesthetic approach.”

An old western town built as a set for a Willie Nelson film was restored

In a change from the traditional preservation stories AN covers was news that the town of Luck, Texas, designed by Willie Nelson for the film he produced and starred in Red Headed Stranger, has been restored. The Old West town, complete with a dirt road street, wood buildings, and a saloon, was restored by architects from Cushing Terrell. The film set will now serve as a performing arts and hospitality venue for up to 4,000 guests.

While the buildings themselves were not historic, the architects adopted a light touch approach and treated them as if they were; this involved staying true to the architecture, and keeping the wood material and trusses present throughout.

LPC ruled the entry of a Paul Rudolph–designed home cannot be moved back by 19 inches

Other fun preservation news this year came out of a Landmark Preservation Commission hearing in New York City over a Paul Rudolph–designed townhouse on the Upper East Side, owned by Tom Ford. The modern townhouse at 101 East 63rd Street occupies the footprint of a former carriage house designed in 1881, later redesigned by Rudolph in 1966.

Trash, loitering, and vagrancy outside the residence led the current residents to commission Steven Blatz Architects to redesign the entryway. A proposal presented to the LPC sought to move the recessed doorway out by 19 inches—a change that would reduce the distance from the door to the property line from four feet to two-and-a-half feet. Other changes included making alterations to the soffit.

The proposals were turned down by the commission. Preservationists and the community spoke out in defense of the planes, light, and shadows that define the existing structure. One commissioner brought up that if the residence was occupied more frequently the aforementioned issues would be, well, less of an issue.

Sotheby’s purchased the fabled Breuer Building

Tenancy of the Breuer Building near Manhattan’s Museum Mile has changed hands a number of times in recent years. In June 2023 the global auction house Sotheby’s announced it would purchase the building. The building was first conceived as a storage facility for The Whitney Museum of American Art in 1966. It was later sold to The Met, and following that the Frick used it for a time.

When Sotheby’s occupies the building fully in 2025 it will make the former museum and art facility its main headquarters, relocating its gallery spaces, auction room, and offices from its current location at 1334 York Avenue.

Read the original article here.

Modernist structures by Paul Rudolph and Ulrich Franzen are New York City’s newest landmarks

Modernist structures by Paul Rudolph and Ulrich Franzen are New York City’s newest landmarks

The Architect’s Newspaper
Edward Gunts - December 21, 2023

After several Modernist buildings by Paul Rudolph have fallen to the wrecking ball or been substantially altered, 2023 is ending with one of the last buildings he designed gaining protection as a public landmark.

The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) on Tuesday voted unanimously to designate Rudolph’s Modulightor Building an individual city landmark. The commission also voted to designate a one-story structure by Ulrich Franzen: the Barkin, Levin & Company Office Pavilion in Long Island City. The designations protect both buildings from changes to their exteriors, including demolition. Any proposed changes will have to be reviewed and approved by LPC before the city issues a construction permit.

Located at 246 East 58th Street in Manhattan, the Modulightor Building is one of just a few structures Rudolph designed in Manhattan, where he moved at the height of his career in the mid-1960s. A six-story, multi-purpose structure that replaced a row house dating from the 1860s, it takes its name from an architectural lighting company that Rudolph founded in 1976 with Ernst Wagner, featuring customizable light fixtures and systems.

The Modulightor Building is the only publicly accessible structure in New York designed by Rudolph, who died in 1997. Constructed in two phases starting in 1989, it contains a ground floor commercial space that serves as a showroom for Modulightor. Its upper levels are occupied by the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture. Other Rudolph-designed buildings in Manhattan are 23 Beekman Place, where Rudolph lived for many years, and the Halston house at 101 East 63rd Street, a private residence owned by designer Tom Ford—both already designated as landmarks.

The lower four floors of the Modulightor Building were designed by Rudolph and completed in 1993, four years before his death in 1997. The upper two floors and a roof deck were added by architect Mark Squeo between 2010 and 2016, using Rudolph’s preliminary drawings for a six-story structure on the site.

In recent years, several of the Rudolph’s buildings have been demolished or significantly altered. The list includes Burroughs Wellcome headquarters in North Carolina and his Shoreline Apartments in Buffalo, New York.

This week’s LPC designation and possible landmark designation in Boston of Rudolph’s 12-story Blue Cross/Blue Shield Building at 133 Federal Street come as more positive developments to those who admire his work. At the request of the building’s owner, commissioners agreed to extend the public comment period to December 27 before taking action.

“This is a great designation partly because there are fewer and fewer Rudolph buildings around and he’s an undeniably important mid-century-and-later architect in the U. S.,” said LPC commission vice chair Frederick Bland.

“During his lifetime, Rudolph wished our residence at 23 Beekman Place would become a study and resource center for the architectural community,” Wagner said in a statement. “When that didn’t happen, I promised him that I’d use the Modulightor building to fulfill his wish and then created the Paul Rudolph Institute for Modern Architecture. It is fitting that the Modulightor building – designed by and dedicated to Paul Rudolph – will be preserved as a living example of his genius. Thank you to the Landmarks Preservation Commission for ensuring future generations will get to experience and learn from his work.”

LPC’s hearing on December 19 also designated the Barkin Levin Company Office Pavilion in Long Island City, one of the first projects Ulrich Franzen completed after starting his own office. Constructed in 1957 and 1958 as part of a factory complex in Queens, it was described by the landmarks commission as “a distinguished example of mid-20th century commercial architecture, a graceful minimalist building set on a small, landscaped parcel of land and enclosed by low brick walls, concrete walkways, and grass lawns.”

“It’s no coincidence that you brought them both together because they’re of the same period and these two architects were in fact contemporaries and knew each other,” said LPC commissioner Jean Lutfy of the two buildings. “The other interesting thing is that both of these projects are aberrations from their Brutalist style, so they’re a little more refined and they’re definitely more an expression of what was going on at this particular time….I think we’re so fortunate to sort of capture them and preserve them and recognize them, and I’m so happy to be part of that process.”

Read the original article here.